728 x 90

No Place Like Home to Help Freedom Grow

No Place Like Home to Help Freedom Grow

While having dinner with a Chinese couple several years ago, I listened as they described their visiting parents’ response to the American landscape. Having recently arrived from China, the parents’ amazement about the Dakotas was particularly amusing. “So much space!” was the loose translation. “They could build so many apartments!”

I laughed heartily at the time, realizing just how different American interests were from those of the Chinese. Americans certainly didn’t need myriads of high rises stretching across the Dakota plains!

But in retrospect, I now wonder if there was more underlying that comment than simply the Chinese need for space. Could such a thought also stem from the communist ideology that pervades China, an ideology that squelches freedom and seeks control over every aspect of life?

Home ownership, the ideal of a little house with a white picket fence, is the American dream. That house is a place of rest, a place to gather—a place to live, work, and play in. At its heart, the little-house-and-picket-fence dream is freedom itself: control over a small piece of property an American can call his own.

That American dream still lives. But not everyone thinks that’s a good thing, judging from a recent Time magazine headline that declared “America Needs to End Its Love Affair With Single-Family Homes.”

Housing developers, the article explains, are continually trying to buy land and develop communities of multi-family dwellings—in essence, the high-rises our friends from China were so eager to build. But these same developers seem to be mildly exasperated because, despite their best efforts to patiently explain the benefits of housing density, many individuals continue to inquire and dream about single-family homes.

“I would love to own a single family home and have pets and children running around,” one woman told Time. “I would rather not be in an apartment building. It doesn’t feel as homey.”

Unfortunately, affordable single-family home ownership is increasingly difficult to achieve. Corporations such as BlackRock are gobbling up single-family homes and turning them into rentals, writer Pedro Gonzalez explains in the August 2021 issue of Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture.

In the article, he also draws attention to the fact that multi-family housing is pushed by those who fear climate change and view America through a racist lens—for, of course, single-family dwellings encourage both a larger carbon footprint and the concept of the nuclear family, the latter of which was once a direct target of Black Lives Matter.

The increasing difficulty of owning a home is likely not accidental, for—as philosopher James Burnham wrote in his 1941 book The Managerial Revolution,—“ownership means control; if there is no control, then there is no ownership.” Thus, if our ruling elites can prevent average folks from owning their own homes, doing so will strip those same people of more freedom and control over their own lives.

Burnham himself uses this issue of home ownership to illustrate how property rights translate into freedom: “If I own a house, let us say, that means that—at least under normal circumstances—I can prevent others from entering it. In developed societies with political institutions, it means also that the state (the police in this instance, backed by the courts) will if necessary enforce this control of mine over access to the house. If I cannot, when I wish to, prevent others from entering the house, if anyone else or everyone has the same rights of entry as I, then neither I nor anyone would say that I am the ‘owner’ of the house.”

Burnham also notes that the control that comes with ownership offers many benefits to the owner, including “warmth, shelter, [and] privacy.” Take that control away and give it to someone else—such as a corporation or the government—and the individual can kiss both freedom and those benefits goodbye.

But if we want those benefits, then we need to hold on to the American dream ever more tightly, not only for ourselves, but for others also.

Do you want to be free from the grasp and control of government? Then put your earnings toward a house and other amenities that will make that home more comfortable for yourself and those you love, instead of spending your earnings on experiences or other frivolous items.

Do you want your children to know and value freedom? Then encourage them toward home ownership and set aside a small nest egg to help them toward that purpose one day. Teach them how to do the things that will aid in maintaining that house. Learning to paint, repair, and beautify a home while young will lay the groundwork for greater pride and ownership in—and desire for—their own future property.

Do you want others to experience the freedom that having a place to call their own brings? Encourage them to buy a house and then pay it off quickly. Give them a helping hand with their house projects where you’re able. Make your own home a bright spot to which you can invite them so that they get a taste of the freedom and benefits that home ownership brings.

Those who seek to control our bodies and minds would like nothing better than to stick each of us into a soul-crushing, rented high-rise in order to quash our freedom. Don’t let them do it. There’s no place like home—especially when it’s in the land of the free.

This article is republished with permission from The Epoch Times. 

Image Credit: Flickr-Lars Plougmann, CC BY-SA 2.0


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *


  • Avatar
    July 13, 2022, 11:30 am

    I’d be interested in your extrapolation of Home Owners Associations and single family homes. Isn’t an HOA just an incremental nudge toward losing control?

    • Avatar
      July 15, 2022, 3:56 pm

      But at least an HOA is a private contract that you do not have to enter into. You do NOT have to buy that home. What is far worse is when a local jurisdiction suddenly decides that you can no longer garden in your front yard, cannot have religious statues visible from the street, cannot have a lawn, etc. Most HOAs are the product of builders pandering to perpetual "Karens" who simply cannot abide by freedom for others if it offends them in any way. So a builder establishes and HOA, throws in a pool, tennis courts, etc. and then imposes draconian restrictions on house colors, fences, etc. to pander to a specific customer base. But again, if you don’t want it, don’t buy it. Now a city forcing EVERY development to be an HOA with specific restrictions, etc. is a different thing entirely.

  • Avatar
    July 15, 2022, 3:59 pm

    Its always been about control. That is why the first thing most new cities do is establish "planning and zoning" departments and start imposing regulations on behavior, style, appearance, etc. They all claim it is about "preserving home values" but it is really all about control. Indeed, buy a home with as little restrictions as possible, got to city council meetings and speak out against restrictions and controls, keep your children completely away from the government monopoly day prisons that pretend to be schools, and cultivate liberty and freedom at home and within your neighborhood and community.

  • Avatar
    Liberty First
    July 16, 2022, 3:16 pm

    I read that Chinese woman’s comments as exactly those that would come from a Communist mindset, from a culture so vastly different from ours that in many ways itself presents a danger to the Western ideal of individual liberty.

    As for home "ownership", no one in "America" who pays property taxes on his/her home EVER owns that home. Ever. People must get their heads around this. The immorality of a tax on your home that could result in the loss of that roof over your head — even if the debt to the lender is fully paid off? How is that people don’t get this?? One is never a home "owner" in "America" as long as property taxes exist.

    How this ever came to be in the first place is an indictment against the people of this country — those who thought it up in the first place and all of those who continue to remain silent to its immorality.

    • Avatar
      Diana Connan Forgy@Liberty First
      July 25, 2022, 12:18 am

      Pacific Legal Foundation has litigated some cases for "homeowners" who found their property seized and sold for far less then its value, often to friends of government officials, for failure to pay some trivial amount of tax. The cases would make your blood boil if you read them.

  • Avatar
    Valerie Gottschalk
    July 12, 2023, 9:56 am

    We MUST hold onto private property rights! It's one of the few ways to fight for control of our lives!


Posts Carousel

Latest Posts

Frequent Contributors