You’ve been there. You’re in the store, minding your own business when suddenly you hear the angry screams of a child, interspersed with:
“Johnny, get up off the floor this instant!
I mean it, Johnny! By the time I count to three…
Johnny, mommy will give you a cookie when we get to the car if you get up off the floor.”
Unfortunately, such a scenario is all too real in a society which no longer seems to value parental authority. In fact, parental authority seems to have all but disappeared in many families. Instead, children are given the velvet glove treatment – their desires must always be fulfilled, their whims never crossed.
How did we arrive at such a state?
Professor and author Christopher Lasch offers an interesting answer to this question in his book The Culture of Narcissism. In essence, one might say that the growth of our feelings-oriented culture is a main culprit:
“According to [Jules] Henry and other observers of American culture, the collapse of parental authority reflects the collapse of ‘ancient impulse controls’ and the shift ‘from a society in which Super Ego values (the values of self-restraint) were ascendant, to one in which more and more recognition was being given to the values of the id (the values of self-indulgence).’”
As Lasch goes on to explain, the increasing value we’ve placed on feelings and self-indulgence has handcuffed parents in dealings with their children. Instead of laying down the law and teaching their children restraint, American parents “‘find it easier to achieve conformity by the use of bribery than by facing the emotional turmoil of suppressing the child’s demands.’” Unfortunately, such a tactic has severe consequences:
“In this way they undermine the child’s initiative and make it impossible for him to develop self-restraint or self-discipline…. The decline of parental authority reflects the ‘decline of the superego’ in American society as a whole.”
Many parents, teachers, and public figures have come to recognize how valuable it is for children to develop these same traits of initiative, self-restraint, and self-discipline. The question is, will we be able to foster these coveted traits in the next generation without the restoration of parental authority? And is it possible to restore parental authority when the current generation of parents was raised without it?
—
This article originally appeared on Intellectual Takeout in 2017.
Image Credit: Dmitry Ryzhkov, bit.ly/1iowB8m
3 Comments
Jeff Ludwig
October 5, 2023, 4:21 pmLasch’s receptivity to Freudian ideation has some merit. However we should not forget the influence of Dr. Benjamin Spock with his permissive ideas of child rearing after World War II. Further cell phones imbue children with an unrealistic sense of power. The phones give them a sense of power that is not expressive of the physical and emotional realities of their lives.Then, recently, we can observe demonic attacks on the identity of children as aggressive pornographic exposure to children along with insistent questioning of their identities by radicalized adults puts the focus on THEM! You have the answers. You know if you are a boy or not a boy. It is that all-American ethos of self-reliance carried to an extreme as family and family dependence is increasingly squashed in the minds of children as well as their parents who don’t want to appear to be uptight or conventional.
REPLYredoubtable
October 7, 2023, 10:16 amSadly, this whining strategy has already become the chief tactic for narcissists getting their own way…..from feminists, to gays, unions, socialists political parties and all other groups that claim victimization as justification for those accused of not satisfying the every demand of the arrested adolescents being forced to pay the price, whatever it might be.
REPLYTo reverse this, parents must early on not give in to the childish tyranny and learn to reward only behavior of obedience.
j
January 5, 2024, 4:15 pmThis analysis completely ignores the harmful effects of child welfare services "protecting" children by taking them away from their parents. For Bible-reading. For spanking. For refusing vaccinations. For feeding them wrong. For refusing to buy them video games/tech. For refusing to let kids hang out with gang members, or go on the pill, trans. I've worked this area for decades. I've seen it.
Parents are terrified of having their children taken, so they capitulate and let the kids get away with anything.
Children are taught by schools to turn their parents in for anything, so even if parents don't capitulate, they lose their kids.
Parental authority has been gutted by the state.
REPLY