I received a rather frantic email from a friend when school started last fall. Panicking over the number of parents posting first day of preschool pictures, my friend wondered if she had made a mistake by not sending her four-year-old to school. “When did preschool become so popular?” she asked in dismay.
She wasn’t imagining things. Preschool is very popular. Education is important, argues society, so the sooner a child starts school, the better off he will be. As a result, many little kids are almost expected to read and do simple algebraic equations before starting kindergarten. (I’m kidding on that last one. But, you never know…)
It hasn’t always been like this. Once upon a time kids didn’t go to preschool. Or kindergarten. And when they did go to the latter, the expectations were much more kid-friendly and age appropriate.
I realized this when I ran across the following image shared by Sarah Mackenzie, author of The Read-Aloud Family. Strikingly absent from the list, Mackenzie notes, is any mention of knowing letters or being able to read.
Instead, the kindergarten learning ideals from 1954 are play-based, offering experience with real-life activities such as sewing, gardening, and cooking. Singing and interacting with others is also given high priority. And while individual reading is not taught, children interact with books and enjoy being read to aloud.
This agenda is similar to the one followed by the ancient Greeks, according to Henri Marrou’s book A History of Education in Antiquity:
In a sense, of course, the child’s education began in these early years. He was introduced into social life and shown how to behave, how to be well-mannered and polite, and also given some kind of moral discipline….
In these early years, too, he began to learn something about his own culture. Like any child today, he entered the enchanted world of music by hearing cradle-songs… he came into contact with ‘literature’ through his nurse’s tales….
These early years were in fact primarily a time for play….
Marrou goes on to say that several of the great philosophers did suggest starting rigorous academics at early ages, but most families ignored such advice. Instead, they kept the child at home doing these play-based tasks and waited until a child was seven to officially start school.
Would it be better for our children to return to a similar practice? Do we need to consider whether the rush to keep little Johnny on par with little Jimmy is really for the benefit of the children? And if we consider this carefully, might we find that the rush for early achievement is more for the pride of parents?
—
This article originally appeared on Intellectual Takeout in 2019.
Image Credit:
Flickr-John Atherton CC BY-SA 2.0
6 Comments
Kay
September 1, 2023, 9:41 amI went to kindergarten in 1952, and what you describe is what we did. It is by far the best thing for most children, especially boys, who are, in general, not ready to embark on academic work until the age of seven.
For me it wasn’t best, since I was panting to learn to read and hideously disappointed to discover that reading was not on the kindergarten agenda. Provision should be made for atypical children, but in the fifties most parents simply followed the program and didn’t provide individual attention. Still, it was much better for children then than it is now.
REPLYMark Gwynn@Kay
September 1, 2023, 7:23 pmRaymond & Dorothy Moore wrote about this and wrote the book, "Better Late Than Early".
REPLYBefore homeschooling our 3 children during the early 1980's we read a wide variety of books concerning education and found this book interesting.
David Butz
September 1, 2023, 7:23 pmPublic schools, whether we are talking about preschool, kindergarten, or 1st-12th grade is all in the eyes of parents nothing more than daycare so they can chase the dollar and fill their lives with the idols of this world.
REPLYTionico
September 2, 2023, 2:57 amParentswho wait for the school to teach their chidren tored, write, cuoer, etc, are, in general, lay.
REPLYI'm the oldest of non. We ALL learned to raed at home before we ever started school. We even had or own books each of us. One of my little brothers aicht himself to read before his fourth birthday. He just asked questions like"what's that letter? WHat does it sayh"> Taught himself spanish in high school. No outside help, got a summer job at a plastic speedboat factory and asked his mexican co-workers questions. Within a year he was fluent in spanish.. Now he speaks german, french, chinese, and twelve local dialects of spanish, all self taught.
Bob Mounger
September 4, 2023, 4:07 pmI knew a lady from Kerala who had a son in a school in Silicon Valley somewhere. He failed the test to get into kindergarten in one place & had to go to another school.
She came to school one day to pick him up & while waiting in the hall could hear the teacher giving the kindergarteners dictation.
Her son was marked down because he couldn't do it in cursive.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I live in Dallas, I knew a fellow who wanted to be a missionary in Burma. He worked at my company to make & save some money to help support himself in mission. While still in the USA he tried to help some kids in his apartment complex. One young man was 18. He was already told he would graduate high school.
My friend said this 18 year old could not read, write, or do single digit arithmetic.
REPLYMissy
September 5, 2023, 3:21 pmI went to half day kindergarten in 1960. I had to have my afternoon nap! The list in the article is familiar. I could do everything except use scissors. My mother bought me electric scissors from Romper Room because she thought they were safer. So I did not know how to manually cut with scissors. Fwiw, I learned to read using Dick, Jane and Sally. My mother said I just "picked it up' on my own.
REPLY