728 x 90

The Native Americans Who Owned Slaves

The Native Americans Who Owned Slaves

Did you know that the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery did not apply to all slaves?

Most see slavery as a simple black-vs.-white issue. But those who do may not realize that the “Five Civilized Tribes” of the southeast — Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole — also participated in the institution of slavery.

Because these tribes were located outside the sovereignty of the United States, constitutional amendments did not apply to them.

In the period before the arrival of the Europeans, the Natives  practiced flexible forms of slavery that often allowed slaves avenues to freedom through intermarriage. That all changed with the arrival of the Europeans, who introduced Native Americans to a system of permanent bondage based on race.

According to journalist Aliana E. Roberts, this switch occurred after the Yamasee tribe lost a war against the English Carolina colonists in 1717.  The Europeans began turning from Native slavery to African slavery, and the Native Americans followed their lead. Many Natives, especially those in the “Five Civilized Tribes” (so-called because they embraced the ways of American settlers) picked up on the trend. By 1800, they had developed “plantations that rivaled those of their white neighbors.”

Roberts states that like most average Americans, many Natives did not own black slaves. Most slaveowners were part of the upper-classes, and were those who had the most influence in society.

In spite of this she also notes that the percentage of black slaves in the population was not insignificant:

In 1860…Cherokee Nation citizens owned 2,511 slaves (15 percent of their total population), Choctaw citizens owned 2,349 slaves (14 percent of their total population), and Creek citizens owned 1,532 slaves (10 percent of their total population). Chickasaw citizens owned 975 slaves, which amounted to 18 percent of their total population, a proportion equivalent to that of white slave owners in Tennessee, a former neighbour of the Chickasaw Nation and a large slaveholding state.

While many Native American nations allowed white slaves to earn their freedom through intermarriage, the tribes also had strict laws forbidding any intermarriage between a Native and a black slave, often punishing those who married their slaves with banishment from the tribe.

The Native slaveowners could also be horrifyingly brutal towards their black slaves. This is illustrated by the case of Lucy, a black slave burned alive for the murder of her native master. She had no part in the murder but was executed anyway at the request of the murdered warrior’s wife.

During the Civil War, the “Five Civilized Tribes” fought on both the Union and Confederate sides. After the war, the Treaties of 1866 freed the slaves. Even after that, blacks still faced discrimination in the Indian territories, with many tribes passing laws similar to the infamous “Black Codes” in the South.

This often-overlooked part of American history takes on new significance in light of today’s debates over slavery reparations and monuments to those who owned slaves or fought to keep them.

Do the descendants of the “Five Civilized Tribes” owe reparations for slavery? Should monuments to their leaders be taken down? The institution of slavery was rightfully eradicated with the passage of the 13th Amendment. But any debate over how to deal with the legacy of this evil institution must remember that the phenomenon was much more complex than is often portrayed or remembered.

A version of this article was first published in July 2019.

Image credit: Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

ITO

5 comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

5 Comments

  • Avatar
    Richard
    June 15, 2023, 4:48 pm

    The title should be Native Americans who owned black slaves. I give you the Comanches who were prolific slavers except it was mostly Mexicans and other Indians with a few whites thrown in.

    REPLY
  • Avatar
    Hakim
    September 12, 2023, 11:17 am

    The only thing you failed to add was the benefits that the “blacks” received from slavery then this new found interest in all aspects of slavery will still be incomplete. I’d like to see an article that describes the boat building , insurance , and bonds that is the financial infrastructure that supported and got rich on slavery . That would be enlightening rather than this pitiful attempt to absolve white America of its crime. No we will never forget.

    REPLY
    • Avatar
      Quek@Hakim
      September 12, 2023, 2:22 pm

      The entire world was using slavery. The first documents to help end slavery were the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Right now everyone wants to demonize America. The reason is simple. If we were founded on slavery, slavery is evil than our founding was evil and it should be the duty of all to destroy America. That is the left.

      REPLY
  • Avatar
    Kalikiano Kalei
    September 27, 2023, 4:45 pm

    There were also, despite a reticence by most PC historians and historical revisionistas to explore the matter in depth, some free blacks who not only owned 'slaves', but held slave-holding plantations in Louisiana, Virginia and South Carolina (https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/african-american-odyssey/free-blacks-in-the-antebellum-period.html)…but who's counting? The bottom line is that throughout human history human beings have enslaved other human beings, so let's get beyond all the progressive woke kerfuffle and get on with things as nice little racial equals (NOT equitables).

    REPLY
  • Avatar
    Faye Robison
    November 16, 2023, 5:12 pm

    Those owners of slaves who claimed Choctaw membership were adopted white, half white and very few full blooded Choctaw.
    I cannot find that the Choctaw government itself owned any slaves or profited from slavery. They had to have laws to deal with the situation. Also at times members of the government owned slaves.
    The former slaves received forty acres of land and lived on as much Choctaw land for free as needed to support his family for close to 40 years. In addition membership was offered to the former slaves and approximately 398 accepted the offer. During this period of time leaders of the former slaves proclaimed they did not want to be governed by Choctaw laws, they wants to go to the federal government with their problems. Also they campaigned for a black state when the statehood question came up. The black descendants should sue to descendants of the former slave owners, they are the ones who profited from the labors of the slaves.

    REPLY

Posts Carousel

Latest Posts

Frequent Contributors