728 x 90

How a Fairy Tale Prince Became an Anti-Hero

How a Fairy Tale Prince Became an Anti-Hero

If there is a figure that is not a role model, it is Prince Harry, son of Charles III of the United Kingdom. His ghostwriter-assisted memoir, Spare, presents not a fairy tale prince but a postmodern anti-hero intent upon destroying the ancient structures around him.

The sordid details of the author’s tragic life are best left unread. What makes the book important is its cultural impact. The prince reflects the prevailing ethos of seeing all things through the prism of self. He plays the eternal victim in a painful whine-fest that sickens the observer. Such behavior inevitably leads to unhappiness—even among those like the prince who seems to have everything.

His shocking actions fit in with the present culture of gratification and politically-correct victimhood. What makes his case different is the grand scale of the unfolding drama.

Unfathomable Self-Absorption

The theme of self-absorption is indeed unfathomable. The book’s message is that there is a universe called Prince Harry that must be the object of everyone’s attention. Thus, there is no detail of his life that is uninteresting. There are no rules that he must follow. His quest for happiness must not be impeded by anything.

Entering into this universe of self-worship is the great injustice of rules, duties and tragedy. Such intrusions happen in every man’s life, especially those who should play great roles in society, like the prince. Most brave men—true Christians—embrace suffering and become individuals with character and honor.

However, the prince wants nothing to do with such proposals. Avoiding discomfort becomes an obsession. There is no passion or sin that cannot be justified. Hard drugs dull the pains of his dissolute life. Everything is a cause of anxiety and panic attacks. Anything said against Meghan must be interpreted as racist. Traditions and the monarchy, the source of all public interest in him, means nothing to him in this enclosed universe.

Service, a Joy?

A second theme that permeates the debate around the book is the prince’s aversion to service. The title, Spare, purportedly comes from the comment of then-Prince Charles, who, upon learning of his younger son’s birth, said he now had an heir (William) and a spare (in Harry).

The prince finds this role humiliating. Perhaps the prince forgets that his grandmother, Elizabeth II, was also a “spare,” who unexpectedly stepped up to the throne and assumed a life of sacrifice and service. For this reason, she was so beloved by hundreds of millions worldwide.

However, Prince Harry rejects living in anyone else’s shadow. He resents any conformity to pre-established norms that prevent him from being himself. The postmodern notion of the self-created man who constructs himself based upon whims and desires is very present in this obsession.

Again, traditionally men have always found a purpose in life by being disposed to serve a higher ideal than self. The service of God and neighbor can be the source of the great joy that eludes the prince.

Awaiting God’s Grace

The most tragic part of the controversy is the complete absence of God and religion. His path follows society’s cold secular outlook that excludes God from the panorama. His situation reflects well the words of Saint Augustine, who speaks of two types of love: “The love of God unto the forgetfulness of self, or the love of self unto the forgetfulness and denial of God.”

This Divine presence is the missing ingredient that would give meaning and purpose to the prince’s life. Alas, it would do the same to all the royal actors in this sad drama. God’s saving grace would breathe new life into those institutions that, as the Queen’s funeral proved, so well express the aspirations of the English people.

The corrosive effect of the prevailing atheist culture upon the royal family makes all the more timely the supplication: God save the King!

 A Representative Character

There is nothing unique in Prince Harry’s story. The same plot applies to all who have walked down the disastrous road of postmodernity. Every tradition and social structure must be questioned, and every narrative denied.

What sets his story apart from others is his immense influence on society.

Like it or not, Prince Harry is what sociologists call a representative character. Every society has these representative figures who act as unifying symbols. When they make the great sacrifice of doing their duty, they can take the principles, moral qualities, and virtues desired and needed by their communities, states or nations and translate them into concrete programs of life and culture.

Moral philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre writes that such characters “are, so to speak, the moral representatives of their culture, and they are so because of the way in which moral and metaphysical ideas and theories assume through them an embodied existence in the social world.”

A Crisis of Duty

One cause of today’s crisis is that representative characters at all social levels fail to do what they should. When natural leaders like Prince Harry do their duty and make the sacrifice of being role models, they do immense good for society and contribute to a rich and elevating social life. They can aid the sanctification of souls by their promotion of virtue.

However, when these figures take advantage of their position and become bad role models, they bring down all of society and themselves. The memoir Spare is a tragic example of how low things can go.

As the Gospel says, salt that loses its savor is only suited to be trodden underfoot. When such figures become anti-heroes, they are like spares who reject their calling because they choose to be useless flat tires instead.

This article is republished courtesy of The Imaginative Conservative.

Image credit: Flickr-DoD News, CC BY 2.0

ITO

3 comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

3 Comments

  • Avatar
    Kalikiano Kalei
    January 27, 2023, 2:11 am

    Well said, John. Harry, in this epic whine-fest of his (and his writer), has epitomised the present younger generation in all its inward-turned, narcissist self-absorption. His father, King Charles III, had an exceedingly wry sense of humor that was not known to any substantial degree by the public; his quip, therefore, about having 'an heir and a spare' fits right in with that nuance of his private persona…an aspect of his father's personality that Harry obviously never quite understood or appreciated. And of course, there's also the matter of the fawning adulation that his mother commanded from that same dreary public (which in itself is an indictment of the maudlin nature of today's common person) that Americans can never quite get enough of. Harry certainly has played all the angles in this puerile paean to his victimhood, hasn't he? I agree, by the way, with your suggestion that this is a book best left alone; there are so many much finer, nobler things to read, after all!

    REPLY
  • Avatar
    Margaret
    January 27, 2023, 3:16 am

    Not only was Harry's grandmother, the great Queen Elizabeth II a spare, so was his great grandfather, the great King George VI, who lead his country with distinction during WWII. Harry is, unfortunately, in the mold of his great uncle, King Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne on the eve of WWII. He, too, was a selfish may who wanted the trappings of royalty, adulation and money, but did not want any part of the duty of royalty.

    REPLY
    • Avatar
      Neutrino@Margaret
      January 27, 2023, 4:52 pm

      Harry, in the mold of great-uncle Edward VIII, is unfit to serve either himself or his country. He may awaken eventually, and many people will forgive him.

      REPLY

Posts Carousel

Latest Posts

Frequent Contributors