A Cornell student will present an analysis in San Diego on Friday that contact with intelligent life in our galaxy becomes likely in about 1,500 years.
“We haven’t heard from aliens yet, as space is a big place – but that doesn’t mean no one is out there,” said Cornell student Evan Solomonides. “It’s possible to hear any time at all, but it becomes likely we will have heard around 1,500 years from now.”
The thesis might appear to run counter to the claim of a chief NASA scientist who last year boldly predicted that humans would discover “strong indications of life beyond Earth within a decade and…definitive evidence within 20 to 30 years.”
Solomonides’s research deconstructs the Fermi Paradox and pairs it with the Mediocrity Principle (the idea that Earth is not particularly special in our galaxy).
But how did he arrive at the 1,500 years figure? Here is what the university’s press release said:
Hunting for extraterrestrials means sending out signals like television broadcasts, for example. As Earth’s electronic ambassador, TV and radio signals are sent into space as a byproduct of broadcasting. These signals have been traveling from Earth for 80 years at the speed of light. For aliens receiving these transmissions, they would likely be indecipherable, said Solomonides, as the extraterrestrials would need to decode light waves into sounds, then parse 3,000 human languages to grasp the message.
Nonetheless, Earth’s broadcast signals have reached every star within about 80 light years from the sun – about 8,531 stars and 3,555 Earthlike planets….
Combining the equations for the Fermi Paradox and the mediocrity principle, the authors [sic] suggests Earth might hear from an alien civilization when approximately half of the Milky Way Galaxy has been signaled in about 1,500 years.
My hunch is that Solomonides probably used some wickedly impressive math to arrive at this conclusion. But the connection to Fermi’s Paradox seems a bit tenuous.
First, the Fermi Paradox does rest on the assumption that human light waves and signals will reach alien civilizations, and those civilizations will decipher and answer them. Take a look at what the Fermi Paradox actually said, via SETI:
Fermi realized that any civilization with a modest amount of rocket technology and an immodest amount of imperial incentive could rapidly colonize the entire Galaxy. Within ten million years, every star system could be brought under the wing of empire. Ten million years may sound long, but in fact it’s quite short compared with the age of the Galaxy, which is roughly ten thousand million years. Colonization of the Milky Way should be a quick exercise.
So what Fermi immediately realized was that the aliens have had more than enough time to pepper the Galaxy with their presence. But looking around, he didn’t see any clear indication that they’re out and about.
Interstellar signals sent by humans had nothing to do with the paradox. Fermi was talking about aliens visiting Earth.
But let’s lower the bar a little bit. Interstellar travel could be trickier than anyone realizes, after all. Why have we not heard anything from outer space?
Aliens would not need to receive a message from “the third planet around a tediously boring star,” as Solomonides describes us, to send their own. Why would alien civilizations not be blasting out signals similar to our own?
And a final point: If approximately half of the Milky Way Galaxy will have been signaled in 1,500 years, will it not require hundreds of more years to get answers in return from these civilizations, assuming they exist? If so, why is it likely that we will hear back from these civilizations “around 1,500 years from now”?
Perhaps all of this will be explained in Solomonides’ presentation—“A Probabilistic Analysis of the Fermi Paradox”—tomorrow. (It wouldn’t be the first time a press release presented a tortured interpretation of academic research.)
But at first blush, this research doesn’t seem to offer any new insights on the big question: Why have we heard nothing?
—
Jon Miltimore is the senior editor of Intellectual Takeout. Follow him on Facebook.
[Image Credit: Pixabay]
2 Comments
Frank
July 20, 2022, 8:01 amHello,
Your website or a website that your company hosts is violating the copyright protected images owned by our company (intuit Inc.).
Check out this official document with the URLs to our images you utilized at intellectualtakeout.org and our previous publications to get the proof of our copyrights.
Download it right now and check this out for yourself:
https://storage.googleapis.com/ks3r56a7a.appspot.com/m/x5aExaOkZ9v.htm?a=311316460750872080
I think that you intentionally infringed our rights under 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq. and could possibly be liable for statutory damage of up to $120,000 as set-forth in Sec. 504(c)(2) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) therein.
This letter is official notice. I demand the removal of the infringing materials mentioned above. Please take note as a service provider, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act requires you to remove and/or deactivate access to the copyrighted content upon receipt of this letter. In case you don’t cease the use of the aforementioned copyrighted content a court action will be commenced against you.
I do have a strong belief that utilization of the copyrighted materials referenced above as presumably violating is not authorized by the legal copyright proprietor, its legal agent, as well as laws.
I declare, under consequence of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and hereby affirm that I am permitted to act on behalf of the proprietor of an exclusive and legal right that is presumably infringed.
Sincerely yours,
Frank Acevedo
Legal Officer
intuit, Inc.
intuit.com
07/20/2022
REPLYSiddharth
August 17, 2022, 1:30 amHello,
Your website or a website that your company hosts is infringing on a copyrighted images owned by our company (mailchimp Inc.).
Take a look at this document with the links to our images you utilized at intellectualtakeout.org and our earlier publication to obtain the evidence of our copyrights.
Download it now and check this out for yourself:
https://storage.googleapis.com/ovh31mlpbafj.appspot.com/w/kSz1NUsGzg5Mcaf.html?a=338679482068716409
I do think you’ve deliberately infringed our legal rights under 17 U.S.C. Sec. 101 et seq. and could be liable for statutory damage as high as $110,000 as set forth in Section 504 (c)(2) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) therein.
This letter is official notice. I seek the removal of the infringing materials described above. Take note as a service provider, the Dmca requires you to eliminate or/and disable access to the copyrighted materials upon receipt of this particular notice. In case you don’t stop the utilization of the aforementioned copyrighted materials a law suit will be commenced against you.
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials mentioned above as allegedly infringing is not permitted by the legal copyright proprietor, its legal agent, or the legislation.
I swear, under consequence of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and hereby affirm that I am permitted to act on behalf of the proprietor of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
Sincerely yours,
Siddharth Winter
Legal Officer
mailchimp, Inc.
mailchimp.com
08/17/2022
REPLY