Most Read from past 24 hours
What Mike Tyson Gets Wrong About Leaving a Legacy
- Culture, Entertainment, Featured, Religion, Uncategorized
- June 6, 2025
React19, an advocacy group founded in November 2022 by several vax-injured people, is putting the government to shame in its efforts to help folks hurt by the COVID-19 vaccines. So far, the group has awarded grants for medical expenses to over 80 vax-injured people, by contrast to the federal government, which has compensated just four
READ MOREI once was proud of my profession. I spent over 40 years as a clinician, educator, and researcher and for most of that time thought I was engaged in a noble calling. But all that has changed in the last 3 years. Medicine is lost in The Wilderness. There were warning signals, to be sure.
READ MOREThree-and-a-half years after the dawn of his iron-fisted pandemic rule, California Governor Gavin Newsom has claimed he “would’ve done everything differently” with the benefit of hindsight. As reported by Politico, Newsom made the admission during a taped interview with Meet the Press. “I think all of us in terms of our collective wisdom, we’ve evolved.
READ MOREOn September 6, the White House announced that twice-vaccinated, twice-boosted Jill Biden has COVID-19—for a second time. President Joe Biden tested negative but will begin masking again, the administration also confirmed. A day later, co-host of The View Whoopi Goldberg was missing from the show, having also come down with the virus. Coinciding with these
READ MOREShortly before he died, the astronomer Carl Sagan (1934-1996) offered a two-part warning in an interview with Charlie Rose. The first part of Sagan’s warning touched on humanity’s growing ignorance of science, which Sagan attributed largely to the failure of modern schools. Sagan saw this as a clear danger to humanity, especially in a society built
READ MOREWith some regularity, students in my sociological theory course will ask why we should even entertain arguments about the biological reality of race. They note, correctly, that this topic is controversial. They suggest it is too morally and politically risky to pursue, given historical examples of pseudoscience that have provided fodder for egregious moral and
READ MORE